Because I'm a communicator by profession, word choice is pretty important to me. Not to say I don't occasionally use words in the wrong context or with a mistaken understanding of their meaning. But for the most part, when I write, the words that end up on the page are ones I've thought a lot about. This week, I've been trying to figure out how to write about hunger. As you know, for a while I've been thinking about the whole "food-ache" (i.e. desire to eat for eating's sake). And I'm still working on that. But last Saturday someone made a comment to me that really struck me. She said "well, the hardest thing is that I'm just starving all of the time." I asked what was causing her to feel that way. "This portion control thing just leaves me without enough food, so I feel hungry constantly." (Of course, when I hear stuff like that, the silent red lights and sirens go off in my head.). I asked her if she could think about food choices or behaviors that would help her mitigate the feelings of hunger (I was thinking ….more fiber? more frequent meals? reduce sugary snacks?). But she said "no, there's nothing that will help. And I really hate how it feels." The conundrum I see here is this – personally, I believe there are (at least) two kinds of hunger; one mental and the other physiological. AND THEY ARE BOTH "REAL." I would never try to talk someone out of their feelings or sensations, so whether its physical signs that clue them into hunger, or a mental/psychological reason that gives them that sense, I agree its real and must be dealt with. But I do think we have to separate them out – because amongst those of us in the industrialized world with access to supermarkets and the modern economy, true physiological 'hunger' must necessarily be a function of choice. In other words, if you're working class or higher in this day and age, you aren't going to literally go to bed hungry, unless it's a decision you've made. And without in any way wishing to judge the woman I spoke to on Saturday, I doubt that she really had a clue what it means to actually "starve." In fact, I would even argue that some of the physical signs that we identify as hunger, are possibly something different. For example, a blood sugar crash. In my own experience (and I'm not a diabetic or hypoglycemic or what have you) when my blood sugar crashes it isn't because my body is having a response to LACK of food. Rather, its having a response due to the food CHOICES I've made, which then led to changes in the blood sugar level. Put differently, I've never experienced a change in my blood sugar level that was a result of malnutrition. I've also read a few reports that indicate that even something as simple as 'stomach growling' isn't necessarily a sign of hunger. And whereas the sensation of weakness might be a good indicator, in my experience I have to be careful that I'm not simply just tired. (Yes, there's a difference!). And as for mental hunger, oh man. I think it is those very mental processes that convince us that the signs we are experiencing aren't just "phenomenon" to be observed, but rather are signals for us to eat. When the mind yearns for food, it has a large basket of tricks to play for us in order to convince us to eat, even in the absence of a pure chemical or physical drive. For me, evidence of this brain power is that I can find myself mouth watering and lips smacking for a treat, even when I've just eaten and my tummy is absolutely full. For example, I could have a nice bowl of soup, a salad, some veggies and an entrée and achieve physiological satisfaction, but roll out that dessert cart baby, and suddenly I can't even TELL that my belt is cutting into my stuffed tummy. And let me repeat, I don't think any of these forms of hunger are false. They are all real. Its just how we respond that matters. And I actually think its probably okay to eat for 'mental' reasons. We are human beings, after all, not robots. I, for one, would despair if the ONLY reason I could eat was to satisfy nutritional requirements (how boring!). Food may be fuel, but its most certainly not gasoline or firewood. Lastly, in the interest of full disclosure, I want to come clean about my biases relating to the whole hunger/starvation thing. About 25 years ago, when I was desperately unhappy, clinically depressed, and in a state of post-adolescent trauma, I did actually starve myself. On purpose. My sophomore year in college, I subsisted for about four or five months with a very conscious plan to eat less than 500 calories a day. I can't say if it was anorexia or not, but I do know that at my lowest weight then, I weighed about twenty pounds less than I do now (which scares me to think about). So in a sense, I know exactly what starvation is, and physiological hunger, and mental hunger – but I also know that the brain is so powerful that it can sometimes make pretty big mistakes and over-ride all of those signals. Lucky for me, my psychological misery was greatly lessened by the opportunity to live and study overseas for a year, and once I moved to Spain and was out of my unhealthy environment, I soon found that starving myself made no sense. I took me another 20 years, however, to get back in touch with the correct signals, so that I could stop the bingeing and the dieting, and get back to simply eating. Ultimately, I'll still probably continue tell myself that I'm hungry and I might even sometimes slip and say "boy, I'm starving." But to paraphrase Scarlett O'Hara 'as god is my witness, from now on I'm paying attention to my true comfort zone.' Hmm. I might need to wordsmith that one. |