Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

  • Send me an e-mail!
  • "Every great accomplishment begins with the decision to TRY!"

    "People take different roads seeking fulfillment and happiness. Just because they're not on your road doesn't mean they've gotten lost." --H. Jackson Brown

    "Decide what you want; decide what you're willing to exchange for it; establish your priorities, and go to work." --H.L. Hunt

    Before ...

    Image hosting by Photobucket

    After ...

    Image hosting by Photobucket

    Saturday, August 12, 2006

    Its not my fault!


    Whew! I’m so glad to have found out that, just as I suspected, it wasn’t my fault for being overweight. No, my body size and weight were not my responsibility at all, according to the latest theory. Because, as this new thinking goes, we are seduced into overeating and obesity by the presence of refined sugar in our food, which causes us to become addicted. Our brain chemistry is thereby altered and we become lifelong slaves to food, powerless to overcome impulses which we are programmed to follow.

    Yeah. Right.

    Okay, now I am one of the biggest proponents of the idea that sugar can be addictive and that it affects our brain and body chemistry. I do realize that marketers and agri-businesses are clued into making and selling foods that we find irresistible. I also understand that they capture us at an early age with cereals and sweetened, candy-like foods of all kinds.

    But no matter how twisted and malevolent all of that may be, I simply refuse to give over all my power to the mighty sugar molecule, throwing up my hands in despair and diving into the chocovat. And this is because I believe that human beings have evolved with a higher level of consciousness. This awareness makes us capable of looking past the mere matter of the moment and predicting the future consequences of current actions.

    Put more simply: we can learn.

    I’ll even go a little farther out on a limb and say that I believe that what makes human beings unique is not that we are subject to base instincts and hungers, but rather that we have the ability to actually counteract those forces. From an early age, we learn that one way (and usually the BEST way) to get something we want is to alter our interactions with the people and environment around us. A child might grab a toy of the shelf of the store and say “mine mine mine” but soon enough that child will learn (with guidance) that not everything can be had for the asking.

    So, yes, I find refined sugar to be alluring. Its every bit as appealing and seductive today while I’m maintaining at my goal as it was for me when I was at my highest weight. The junky foods and junky advertising everywhere all around me definitely cause me to desire sugar-y foods, and I’m not immune from falling prey to those forces.

    But I have learned something. That if I can leave that toy on the shelf – even just for a little while, I tend to be a lot happier in the long run.

    Oh yeah, and its not about ‘blame’ or ‘fault’ or ‘culpability.’ Its about evaluating the situation and effecting a change.

    Darn!

    2 Comments:

    I don't know, Jonathan. Next you'll be telling me it's not MacDonald's fault that people who eat there every day have high cholesterol and that it's not the manufacturers of cell phones fault that drivers get into accidents while using them. What's the world coming to if we can't blame everyone else for what we do to ourselves? A better, saner place, I guess. --Richard

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:44 AM  

    Thank you for your nice little note yesterday.

    I do love comments!

    today I added:
    "I had a very nice little note from Jonathon on my post from yesterday. I read him every day and find great motivation from him. Sometimes his posts that are the hardest to read, strike an uncomfortable little cord, are the ones that help me the most . . ."

    By Blogger Vickie, at 9:44 AM  

    Post a Comment

    Friday, August 11, 2006

    Weighing In

    Among my circle of friends in weight management, we have some different views as to the optimal frequency of checking in with the scale.

    Some people would say that a weekly weigh in is the best because it gives you long-term trend information, which is what truly counts. They worry that daily weighing would lead them to seeing frequent ups and downs and trying to associate them (rightly or wrongly) with particular eating occasions or activity levels. That can lead to a fruitless quest for ‘stability’ which is at best difficult and generally speaking impossible.

    For others, the daily weigh in provides useful information that keeps them on track. It can help overcome the fear of fluctuations that can occur inexplicably sometimes. Daily weighing can also provide a sense of security and accountability that one might not get from a once-a-week check in. For these people a once weekly check-in might lead to weekend overeating or other last-minute corrective strategies because of the lack of interim information.

    I’ve tried it both ways and I’m not sure I can advocate for one or the other. They each have pros and cons. Lately I’ve been following a sort of hybrid system. Which is to say that most days I weigh myself in the morning before I go off running, and then once a week I do my official weigh-in and have the number entered into my weight book by a third party.

    Again, there are pros and cons, but this system has given me the best result for the past two or three months. There have been a few times when my weight went up during the week and it upset me, and a few other times when it went down and I got a little cocky. But generally speaking the hybrid method has given me just the amount of information and accountability I like to have in order to be comfortable.

    The one cautionary note I would have is that its probably best to never weigh more than once a day. Occasionally people come to me upset that their weight has gone up (or down) X number of pounds since they weighed earlier in the day. This can cause consternation and surprise. And I think it could probably become problematic if one had any tendencies towards obsession (who, me?).

    At any rate, this week will be interesting, because I haven’t had a chance to weigh in at all, as I’m on the road. (I refuse to use notoriously unreliable health club scales). Since I’m flying home tonight I will be able to do my ‘official’ number tomorrow, which I look forward to. Because in the absence of numerical data, I’ve been forcing myself to use two other maintenance methods, neither of which I find particularly easy. The first is to gauge myself in the mirror and in my clothes to see how I look and feel. After all, my ultimate goal in all of this is to be healthy. The second strategy is to be conscious of not eating when I’m already full. That may sound like a no-brainer, but I’ve never completely mastered the art of ‘stopping when satisfied.’ In fact, several times this week I actually set a timer to give myself a 30 minute break.

    But change is good, right? Stay tuned!

    6 Comments:

    If that number is a little on the high end- try not to panic. I find that the day after a flight I've retained water and am a few pounds heavier than the next day.

    And I had to laugh at your admission of feeling 'cocky' when the daily weigh in reveals a lower than usual number. I've been experiencing a few of those lately... I weigh in, am shocked to see myself at an all time low, start to eat a little less stringently and bam! The next day and everyday thereafter? The weight 'loss' is gone! A mystery, isn't it? Still a nice little ego boost though! ;-)

    By Blogger Jolene, at 7:38 PM  

    A bad weigh in 2 weeks ago led me to depression and more weight gain, but my clothes fit just fine... I guess I get cocky too, esp. when the number was at the lowest ever in July. (lowest ever!) this morning I was down 2 lbs. I know I fluctuate greatly, but it still hurts to see a higher number on the scale. It is terrible that I let a bad weigh-in ruin a whole week for me!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:19 AM  

    I do not own a bathroom scale. In the old years of yo-yo dieting I had one and weighed at home every morning (naked, before eating or drinking, of course). At some point I realized that if I lost weight I would eat more, and if I gained weight I would eat more. Duh. Now I weigh in officially once a month, and sneak a peak at a gym or other scale maybe every week or two. Works much better for me. The daily number can be so frustrating and counter productive .--Richard

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:24 AM  

    I find that both weekly and daily weigh-ins work for me depending on circumstance. If I do my weekly and it's a bit high, I will weigh in for a couple more days to see if fluctuations are happening. Especially if I've been "good". Usually, it's just a water retention issue. If I see a couple days weight gain, and I've been good, I simply increase my water intake to see if things "flush" themselves out. It usually works, especially in these hot days of summer. No, I'm not in San Francisco anymore so I now get more than 2 or 3 hot days of summer. YAY! Also, if my weight has gone down more than expected, I will weigh daily just to make sure I don't get to a place where I get cocky and think I can "cheat" a little. It's all a mind game. And I always weigh before going to the doctors office. That way I can compare my scale to theirs, so that I don't freak out over what their's may say. BTW, I really love reading your blog.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:56 PM  

    I've given up weighing myself altogether and prefer to use a dress which fits snugly. As soon as it gets difficult to do up the zip, I know it's time to take action - unless I am on my period, when I need to wear one size larger in everything (and look three months pregnant!). I imagine many women do.

    London Slimmer

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:03 AM  

    I weigh myself twice a day and consider that restraint.

    I know all this weighing is supposed to be bad, but I find it easier to deal with the flunctuations when I monitor my weight more frequently. Otherwise, I get my hopes up for a big loss and am devastatingly disappointed when it doesn't happen. I know that my AM weight is never more than 3 lbs less than my PM weight. So if I weigh 120 at night, I know I'm not going to weigh 115 in the AM. But if I don't weight myself at night, I have a crazy hope that maybe I will weigh 115 in the AM and then am disappointed when I don't get there. If I only weighed once a week, the anticipation and then the disappointment if it was a week where I didn't lose (and, these days--as I am only a few lbs away from my goal weight, there are lots of those) would be overwhelming.

    Also, if my weight on Friday is the same as it was last Friday, but on the prior Wednesday I hit a new all-time low, I feel better about the lack of progress on Friday. The flunctation on Wed shows I am making progress. Based on my experience, if I hit that weight once, I'll be hitting it regularly in a couple of weeks. But if I only weighed on Friday, then I don't know about the low on Wed and I'll feel worse about the lack of progress on Friday.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:07 AM  

    Post a Comment

    Wednesday, August 09, 2006

    Out of the frying pan ...

    Usually I don’t applaud food not eaten. In my past, I tried so many deprivation-based diets that now I am fanatical about enjoying food and avoiding the celebration of denial. I would rather look in my food journal and smile with satisfaction, than think about all the stuff that tempted me but I avoided.

    Nevertheless, today I gave myself a huge pat on the back for not eating. You see, this morning (like most mornings) I got back from running, threw some veggies in a pan, and then added some egg whites to make a nice omelette. Unfortunately, since I’m in a hotel, I’m not used to the electric stove, and the frying pan isn’t as good as the one I have at home. So ten minutes later, I ended up with a kind of gross mess of metallic-smelling veggies and only partially cooked egg.

    At first, in my morning stupor (post run, but pre coffee) I ladled it onto a plate and thought ‘oh gross, I can’t believe I have to eat this mess.’ And then I realized that no one was forcing me to. Sure, it would be a ‘waste’ … but why eat something I didn’t like?

    So, I poured the entire thing down the disposal, and instead had a veggie sandwich. It was hard to do, since I don’t have a lot of food in the little kitchenette here and the supermarket is kind of a long schlep.

    But in the end, I was really happy that I respected myself enough and had enough wherewithal to ditch the unpalatable and go for the edible (and tasty!). Those who know me, have heard me say this a million times, but today I was so happy to actually follow my own advice:

    ‘If you don’t love it, don’t eat it!’

    5 Comments:

    Throwing food away is one of the most important skills that we all need to learn. We were raised it was a sin to "waste" food, but not that it was a sin to stuff into our bodies more food than we need, or in your case, inedible food, and thereby make ourselves fat or sick. It is far better to send it back to the earth without putting it into our bodies. I say it's a sin against ourselves not to. -- Richard

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:21 AM  

    Funny you should mention not eating inedible food. I was in an airport restaurant yesterday, tried to order a poached egg (no poached, only basted - you want that basted with WATER?? Not bacon grease??), and ended up with a mess of overcooked egg (so tough, I couldn't cut it with the plastic knife) and a pile of unordered cold fried potato thingies. I asked for my check without eating a single bite. Very proud - and the waitress said no charge - after all, I didn't eat any of it! Settled for an orange and half a (yes, white flour) bagel with my Starbucks. Travel is such a glamorous life!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:40 AM  

    Oof - this post reminds me of the day I finally gave up some of my super lo-point/lo-cal foods because I finally realized I really hated them. I think it was two slices of that high fiber Ezekiel bread (1 pt. per piece), egg whites, soy sausage and FF margerine. It was just so gross and smelled so bad all together like that. I'd rather have something a little higher in calories than hate what I am eating, I never did that again.
    I still use the soy sausage when I make whole wheat pizza with green chilies tho' - it's OK if it's HOT.

    By Blogger Kyraylyn, at 11:11 AM  

    Heh. Way back when, I used to eat these protein bars - Protein Plus? - as a special "treat". After a long haitus, I tried one again, and I couldn't believe how awful it was. That used to be my dessert??

    I remember I used to eat a lot of food I hated just to fill me up. Now I use plenty of fat and enjoy every bite I eat. I'm only about 25% of the way through my weight loss journey, so I can't be sure I'll be able to keep this up forever. But I sure hope so.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:06 PM  

    Our local homeless shelter is happy to accept any unwanted food that still in an edible state and they are always THRILLED to receive biscuits, cakes and chocolate. So when we go on holiday, or when someone gives us high-calorie foods as a present, I usually take things round there. If you have a local homeless shelter, you might want to see whether they will accept donations too.

    London Slimmer

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:58 AM  

    Post a Comment

    Tuesday, August 08, 2006

    A Walk in the Park

    Whenever I'm on a trip to Connecticut, or New Jersey, or (as I am right now) Michigan, I'm always struck by how much more inviting it is to walk in San Francisco (or DC, NYC, London, etc.). Its not just that in most of America things are so spread out (and they really are!). Rather, in more densely populated places, there are simply sidewalks everywhere you want to go. And as you walk, there are invariably things to see or places to visit. I guess its my desire for instant gratification, then, that makes me such a city person. Walking, for me, is terribly convenient.

    When I was on my last trip and so far on this trip, I keep finding that when I just look at a map to plan where I'd like to run, I almost invariably discover that the particular route I've chosen has no sidewalk, no shoulder, no safe place to stay away from traffic. I keep forgetting that every place is not connected to every other place if you're on foot.

    For the year that I lived in Silicon Valley, I was extremely frustrated by the contradictory phenomenon of great weather and long, unwalkable distances. It annoyed me so much to have to spend such a great deal of time in my car, because even with the windows down, I always felt so disconnected from the world around me. And since everyone else was encased in their own glass and steel enclosures, it seemed so impersonal, to boot.

    I therefore have all the more respect for those people who actually carve time out of their days to "go walking" -- even if they live in the country, or in the suburbs, or some other car-oriented location. It takes so much more planning in places like that -- you've got to find routes that are safe and walkable, you might even have to drive there, you probably need good shoes and a music player. Kind of like how it is for me to go running.

    So for those of you that climb on treadmills, or power walk, or simply get out for a few minutes of intentional fresh air, my hat goes off to you. Not only is it good exercise, its a way to get in touch with your universe. And you are, most definitely, bucking the trend.

    1 Comments:

    I'm one of those rural folk who have to drive to EVERYTHING. Our nearest movie theater is a 40-mile drive; and when you do get to the bigger towns around me, nothing's geared for walkers.
    I have managed to carve out a nice walking arrangement, a 3-mile walk at 5:30 a.m. weekdays with my sister-in-law. One of the main reasons we go together is because there are no sidewalks on this route, and walking on the road (albeit a quiet country road) can be a little bit dangerous in those early morning hours. If it isn't a pickup truck rumbling down a hill, it's an opossum coming out of us from a cornfield.
    But this morning we marveled at the gorgeous sunrise, and behind us, a seemingly enormous full moon close to the horizon and red from the reflected sunlight. You just can't get that when you're stuck inside on a treadmill.
    In addition, I am fortunate to have a job that is walking distance to my home, and this summer I've walked to it the majority of the time.
    The funniest thing is, people come up to me and say, "I've seen you walking a lot." It's because I am one of the few people around who try to walk instead of drive whenever I can. I may be a curiosity to my little town, but it's also why I've managed to lose 120 pounds and doing my best not to gain it back.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:41 AM  

    Post a Comment

    Monday, August 07, 2006

    Who's at the controls?

    So, I’ve been sent to Michigan on a business trip in the middle of August, where its hot and very muggy. Stupidly, I didn’t bring a sweater or jacket. Not that I need it outside, mind you, since it stays warm all day and night. No, I need something to bolster me inside the conference center where –I swear—its gotta be under 65 degrees.

    Today I was absolutely FREEZING all day long. The only time I warmed up even slightly was during one of the sessions where I managed to position myself directly under a strong overhead light. But the rest of the day I kept shifting around trying to avoid drafts.

    Now I suppose this doesn’t have much to do with healthy weight management. Perhaps it simply speaks to the fact that people would rather wear more clothes than less clothes. I dunno.

    As it is, I had to stumble out of the place at 5:30, frozen like a popsicle, driving around in my rental car desperately looking for a clothes store. (And in case you’re wondering, Lansing has a great little Banana Republic store with the nicest staff!) So now I’m two sweaters poorer than at the start of the day. But I needed to be armed for the next two weeks.

    I’ll also add this -- the fact that I’ve got a nice little kitchenette in my hotel room has really saved the day as far as my mood is concerned. Just having the fridge and the microwave alone would have been worth the price. Today I was able to make an amazing egg-white-and-veggie omelette for breakfast, along with a lo-cal bagel and some non-fat yogurt. For dinner I had a delicious salad, a fruit smoothie and a veggie burger.

    For this trip, I made a conscious decision that I would “bond” with people over the coffee breaks, but use meal time for myself.

    There are some things in life we can control, and some things we can’t. But there are, almost always, pretty good workarounds.

    3 Comments:

    Jonathan,

    Since you are in Lansing - I would like to recommend a WW meeting - the 11:30 meeting in Frandor (shopping center) on Saturdays. The leader - Sue Bennett is excellent!

    Stay warm,

    Sharon

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:42 AM  

    Jonathan, Having spent my first 18 years, and many visits since then, in Chicago I am very familiar with the Midwestern tradition of over-cooling in the summer and over-heating in the winter. They seem to like to keep it at 65 in the summer but about 80 in the winter. I wonder if anyone has calculated how many thousands of extra barrels of oil a day it takes to keep temperatures at these unhealthy extremes. Perhaps you might try a little asserting and see if they can adjust to thermostat? It's no longer just a question of personal comfort; it's about dependence on mideast oil and global warming, too. Good luck. --Richard

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:43 AM  

    As much as it sucks freezing your butt off, isn't there this tiny gleeful feeling that pops up every so often of "Wow! When I was chubby, I never would have been this cold!" I know I have it from time to time. It makes me almost appreciate my shivers! ;-)

    By Blogger Jolene, at 6:49 PM  

    Post a Comment

    Sunday, August 06, 2006

    Pre-flight check

    - Salad (incl. fork and miniature bottle of dressing)
    - Veggie sandwich on whole wheat with lowfat cheese
    - 2 baggies w/ 75 calories worth of flat crackers
    - 1 small baggie of cherries
    - 1 small banana
    - 1 liter of water
    - 1 pack of 100 calorie pretzels
    - 1 baggie with sugar free mint candy

    It was a lot to pack and assemble for my four-hour flight to Michigan today, but I duly assembled all the above and brought in onboard in a small tote. While waiting for my flight to be called at the airport, I noticed that almost everyone is buying food now, since they know they won’t be fed on the plane. And while there are some decent choices available, its incredibly cheaper (not to mention healthier) to bring your own. Equally important is the fact that when you’re sitting around with that weird combination of stress, boredom and fatigue that comes with air travel, the temptation to eat some junky comfort food can be a tough one to ignore. As a result, one of my ‘secrets’ is that I re-use the salad and sandwich containers on the return flight – usually stopping at a salad bar somewhere on my way back to the airport to fill them up.

    Yesterday Richard and I had a long chat over coffee about this and that, and he was explaining to me more of the 'rational recovery' approach to behavior change. What struck me most was the idea that we aren’t victims. This weight management issue, no matter how challenging or frustrating, doesn’t mean we are helpless individuals incapable of change. It just takes work. Its very useful, but NOT enough, to uncover the causes of our overeating. Whether nature or nurture, whether due life changes or the conditioning of society – our food behaviors are not necessarily out of our control.

    Lately, Devin has been putting on some weight and feeling quite distressed about it. While I offer sympathy and extend an offer to help if he needs it, I can see that for the moment, he’s not ready to take action. So it was the other night he got home late from work and had to rush around and grab his gear for his evening tennis match, with no time to eat anything healthy. (Having arrived home late myself) I had already eaten a prepared salad, and had some pre-cooked chicken and vegetables. I suggested one or two things in the fridge that he could try, but instead he decided to dash off to McDonalds. In the end, however, due to traffic, he didn’t even have time for that. And he lost his match, feeling that his game was somehow ‘off.’ By the time he got home he was angry and upset and feeling quite weak.

    So as I stood in the kitchen this morning, putting together my little containers of snacks and getting all of my special treats portioned out in careful amounts, I reflected that indeed, I’m not a victim. Its not about poor pitiful me who has to think ahead and strategize about food options every time he needs to spend more than a day away from home. Its simply about deciding what I want, prioritizing, and getting to work.

    Thanks Richard!



    3 Comments:

    And thank you, Jonathan, for inspiring me every day.
    Speaking of traveling, one habit I now have is to eat a banana right before I get on an airplane. It is so satisfying and calming, and you can dispose of the fragrant peel before getting into an enclosed environment. --Richard

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:41 PM  

    I read you every day and always enjoy what you have to share.

    This was a particularily good posting!!!!!!

    PROactive instead of REactive?

    Mindful instead of mindLESS?

    By Blogger Vickie, at 9:18 AM  

    I have my "conference food" baggie that I take with me on all trips - it contains a high-protein cereal bar for each day, some Kashi bars, raw almonds, and a Pria bar or two. It's not fruit & vegetables, but it keeps me away from the breakfast pastries and the afternoon cookie platters.

    By Blogger Elizabeth, at 12:16 PM  

    Post a Comment